It should be noted that Mr. Hurst’s testimony, the peoples other witness testimony WAS LARGELY BASED OFF OF THE CASE Chisolm v. Georgia, BUT WHEN THE EXPERT CAME ONTO THE TESTYFYING STAND SHE STATED SHE HAD NEVER HEARD OF THAT CASE. As seen below on pg. 183.
Ms. Mendelson went on to say that she could not say with certainty that Ms. Bratton was a Sovereign citizen, but that the TECHNIQUES SHE SUPPOSEDLY USED IN THE DOCUMENTS WERE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN TECHNIQUES. Barbara’s attorney did a good job of showing how she paid taxes, had a car, motor vehicle license, registered her vehicles, attended jury duty, and how she basically adhered to all of the things that make a person the opposite of a sovereign citizen.
Barbara’s attorney also very intelligently highlighted the difference between people who file bogus liens or bogus documents filed against a government official and or private citizens who use sovereign citizen tactics, and people like Barbara, who do not engage in these tactics. The only proof showing anything of Barbara related to the sovereign citizen movement was the document she found on the internet.
This last question and response right above in the picture by Barbaras attorney and Ms. Mendelson sum up perfectly what happened to Barbara. Finding information on a website.
