Lines 1-3 below below state that a Trustee Deed Upon Sale was recorded on March 16, 2012, and that my home was purchased by a Salvador Guevara and a Grant Deed was filed on November &, 2012. Notice how Salvador Guevara is labeled the VICTIM!
A Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale, also known as a Trustee’s Deed Under Sale or a Trustee’s Deed is a deed of foreclosure. This deed is prepared after a property’s foreclosure sale and recorded in the county where the property is located. The Trustee’s Deed transfers the property to the buyer who purchased the foreclosed property at auction. A grant deed is a legal document used to transfer ownership of real property. It is an official record that indicates a title has not already been granted to another person.
Michael A. Ramos and the San Bernardino County Prosecutors office who below on lines 4-9 egregiously and falsely state that Barbara Bratton was a part of an antigovernment movement in the U.S. These two deeds were filed by Barbara only after she received valid information that was verified by the California attorney general that the instruments used to sell her home at the trustee deed upon sale on March 16, 2012, were fraudulent, amongst other things.
From the person selling my home AT AUCTION NOT BEING CERTIFIED TO WORK IN THE STATE, AS WELL AS ROBO SIGNING ON THE NOTARY PORTION, to the actual company handling the sale of the home not being allowed to conduct business in the state, or the company name SPS on the Trustee Deed Upon sale being federally indicted for fraud, or U.S. Bank having no record of this transaction after it was reported and found on paperwork that they were aware of the transaction. IT WAS ALL FRAUDULENT.
Right below we see the District Attorney’s office lie just about everything. First, the property was purchased fraudulently at auction by the people selling and purchasing the property. As well as the bank. Secondly, Barbara believed that she had the authority to do what she did at this time. Here, in the San Bernardino County District Attorneys indictment we see false, inaccurate, unethical, mediocre, and poorly displayed lawyering. Thirdly, we see the DA’s falsely and negligently state that Barbara was PUSHING FORWARD the SOVEREIGN Citizen Movement Radical Ideology. Fourthly, we see them state that Barbara Bratton abuses the legal system by filing frivolous lawsuits.
The whole crux of their mediocre argument was that in a civil action between Salvador Guevara and myself CIVRS1302392 and unlawful detainer related cases UDRS 1300546 and UDRS 1300742, Judge Keith Davis ruled that “the court finds no trial issue of fact as to Barbara’s cause of Quiet Title. Davis went on to say that Barbara lacked ownership and or interest in the subject property in the light of the foreclosure and subsequent purchase by Guevara. This fails in a few ways.
This fraudulent and wrong judicial decision by Mr. Davis in Barbara’s case, is like millions of people’s cases throughout the U.S. Which are based off of fake/ fraudulent paperwork that plagues unlawful detainer courts in the U.S. A better description and explanation of this faulty paperwork could be found in the History section of the website. IT CAN BE HEAVILY ARGUED THAT A FAULTY JUDICIAL DECISON BY MR. DAVIS IN Barbara’s UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE MADE OFF OF A CONSPIRACY TO HURT PEOPLE THROUGH LYING AND FRAUDULENT PAPERWORK, Is OF NO MERIT, AN EMBARSSEMENT TO THE BENCH, AND SHOULD BE OVERTURNED IMEDATELY.
ISSUE PRECLUSION
Issue preclusion, also called collateral estoppel, means that a valid and final judgment binds the plaintiff, defendant, and their privies in subsequent actions on different causes of action between them (or their privies) as to same issues actually litigated and essential to the judgment in the first action. The four essential elements to decide if issue preclusion applies are: 1) the former judgment must be valid and final; 2) the same issue is being brought; 3) the issue is essential to the judgement; 4) the issue was actually litigated.
Those cases helped paint the whole picture/story of what happened to me, how I was treated, and the means used to accomplish this. This is the TRUE REASON THE DA made this motion. They did not want to bring more attention to the unlawful detainer court that is filled with fake paperwork still till this day that affects millions of people.
As you see above lines 1-22 are all fluff and a basic definition. At line 23 we get some substance. “The rule (collateral estoppel) is based upon the sound public policy of limiting litigation by preventing a party who has (HAD A FAIR TRIAL) on an issue from again drawing into controversy.
NEVER AT ANYTIME, whether that was incarcerated for bogus charges or physically in court, because of the American Foreclosure Conspiracy, I NEVER RECIVED A FAIR TRIAL. NOT ONCE!
The picture right below we see the DA say “accordingly, the appearance of justice the criminal justice system needs is best served if all participants in alleged criminal conduct are tried on their cases, own merits, without concern for the results of other trials. The problem with this is that these unlawful detainer cases were so intertwined with the criminal case that it is IMPOSSIBLE TO GET THE WHOLE PICTURE/STORY without it.
Above the DA stated that the issues were identical. Defendant Bratton claims an ownership interest in the subject property which she lost in foreclosure. She filed a QUIET TITLE ACTION seeking the court to restore the property back to her. Barbara fraudulently lost her home to foreclosure because she allowed to present evidence that would exonerate her. The DA then said that the issue of who owns the property was actually litigated in the former proceeding and both sides presented evidence and argument. Mr. Davis signing an order does not mean its finality is solid if like mentioned above the decision was reached through fraudulent means. Such as manipulated fake paperwork, actors of the court, bar, mortgage industry, etc.
